<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CrowdStorm goes live.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eu.techcrunch.com/2006/09/13/crowdstorm-goes-live/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2006/09/13/crowdstorm-goes-live/</link>
	<description>Tracking European web and mobile start-ups</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:17:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: adana sohbet</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2006/09/13/crowdstorm-goes-live/comment-page-1/#comment-184299</link>
		<dc:creator>adana sohbet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=69#comment-184299</guid>
		<description>İt is ver nice...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>İt is ver nice&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch UK &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Crowdstorm comes back, but can it cut it?</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2006/09/13/crowdstorm-goes-live/comment-page-1/#comment-50493</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch UK &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Crowdstorm comes back, but can it cut it?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=69#comment-50493</guid>
		<description>[...] Crowdstorm, the social shopping site, relaunches today with a new vigour to try and wring expert purchasing knowledge out of its social network. The question is, will the changes make a difference, and will they do better when they had a first bite at the cherry a year ago? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Crowdstorm, the social shopping site, relaunches today with a new vigour to try and wring expert purchasing knowledge out of its social network. The question is, will the changes make a difference, and will they do better when they had a first bite at the cherry a year ago? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snarchy</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2006/09/13/crowdstorm-goes-live/comment-page-1/#comment-615</link>
		<dc:creator>Snarchy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=69#comment-615</guid>
		<description>Hello,

I don&#039;t think they can create a success story with this kink of website.
Too complicated for the user, it&#039;s like a private club where you have to understand the rules and all the rest.

Too much investment needed for just the acquisition of a little dvd, or t-shirt.

Still a good idea, but like for the other 2.0 - Like website, I don&#039;t believe in their monetization potential.

Snarchy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think they can create a success story with this kink of website.<br />
Too complicated for the user, it&#8217;s like a private club where you have to understand the rules and all the rest.</p>
<p>Too much investment needed for just the acquisition of a little dvd, or t-shirt.</p>
<p>Still a good idea, but like for the other 2.0 &#8211; Like website, I don&#8217;t believe in their monetization potential.</p>
<p>Snarchy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

