<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ChannelFlip cranks up Web TV shows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eu.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/channelflip-cranks-up-web-tv-shows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/channelflip-cranks-up-web-tv-shows/</link>
	<description>Tracking European web and mobile start-ups</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:16:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Jules Bennet</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/channelflip-cranks-up-web-tv-shows/comment-page-1/#comment-168103</link>
		<dc:creator>Jules Bennet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/channelflip-cranks-up-web-tv-shows/#comment-168103</guid>
		<description>Nearly a year one, I actually think the ChannelFlip team is doing really well now. Good site, some good shows and some high profile advertisers...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nearly a year one, I actually think the ChannelFlip team is doing really well now. Good site, some good shows and some high profile advertisers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agency gal</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/channelflip-cranks-up-web-tv-shows/comment-page-1/#comment-76152</link>
		<dc:creator>Agency gal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 11:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/channelflip-cranks-up-web-tv-shows/#comment-76152</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re missing the point that this is a start-up with interesting potential, not the be all and end all of web TV from day one.  

And I hate to say it but you&#039;re wrong about production values - if you look at the most popular web TV right now - Rocketboom, Revision 3 - you&#039;ll see that consumers dig the &#039;authentic&#039; look of relatively low budget TV (content is king...)  If they want &#039;real&#039; (irrelevant) TV they can switch on the box...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re missing the point that this is a start-up with interesting potential, not the be all and end all of web TV from day one.  </p>
<p>And I hate to say it but you&#8217;re wrong about production values &#8211; if you look at the most popular web TV right now &#8211; Rocketboom, Revision 3 &#8211; you&#8217;ll see that consumers dig the &#8216;authentic&#8217; look of relatively low budget TV (content is king&#8230;)  If they want &#8216;real&#8217; (irrelevant) TV they can switch on the box&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agency guy</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/channelflip-cranks-up-web-tv-shows/comment-page-1/#comment-41107</link>
		<dc:creator>Agency guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 08:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/channelflip-cranks-up-web-tv-shows/#comment-41107</guid>
		<description>This is exactly what web TV should NOT be. Poor production values, dodgy presenters, a thumb in the air in the hope of getting some ad revenue and making it big. And 18-35 men? They could have found a slightly less crowded marketplace. There are much better offerings going on within brand from the major publishers.

WebTV will succeed where TV-style production values are brought online - attention to script, editing, sound and so on. All missing here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is exactly what web TV should NOT be. Poor production values, dodgy presenters, a thumb in the air in the hope of getting some ad revenue and making it big. And 18-35 men? They could have found a slightly less crowded marketplace. There are much better offerings going on within brand from the major publishers.</p>
<p>WebTV will succeed where TV-style production values are brought online &#8211; attention to script, editing, sound and so on. All missing here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

