<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More LinkedIn/News Corp reports coming in</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eu.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/more-linkedinnews-corp-reports-coming-in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/more-linkedinnews-corp-reports-coming-in/</link>
	<description>Tracking European web and mobile start-ups</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:58:09 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Simba</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/more-linkedinnews-corp-reports-coming-in/comment-page-1/#comment-174731</link>
		<dc:creator>Simba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 06:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/more-linkedinnews-corp-reports-coming-in/#comment-174731</guid>
		<description>1 billion? And facebook was said to be worth 950 million? Thats crazy, but seems LinkedIn makes more money though with a small user base like dat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1 billion? And facebook was said to be worth 950 million? Thats crazy, but seems LinkedIn makes more money though with a small user base like dat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; Allen &#38; Co.が LinkedInを$1Bで売り込み中</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/more-linkedinnews-corp-reports-coming-in/comment-page-1/#comment-134412</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; Allen &#38; Co.が LinkedInを$1Bで売り込み中</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 02:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/more-linkedinnews-corp-reports-coming-in/#comment-134412</guid>
		<description>[...] これまで取引をリードしてきた多くの投資銀行と同じく、今回の件も、はじめは売却を試みたものの、買い手が付かないために調達ラウンドに切り換えたと噂されている。昨年後半、News Corp.がLinkedInとその価格帯での買収交渉をしているらしい、という話をTechCrunch UKが報じている。 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] これまで取引をリードしてきた多くの投資銀行と同じく、今回の件も、はじめは売却を試みたものの、買い手が付かないために調達ラウンドに切り換えたと噂されている。昨年後半、News Corp.がLinkedInとその価格帯での買収交渉をしているらしい、という話をTechCrunch UKが報じている。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen &#38; Co. Pitching LinkedIn At $1 Billion</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/more-linkedinnews-corp-reports-coming-in/comment-page-1/#comment-134398</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen &#38; Co. Pitching LinkedIn At $1 Billion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 23:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/more-linkedinnews-corp-reports-coming-in/#comment-134398</guid>
		<description>[...] attempt to sell the company and moved to a funding round when there were no takers. Late last year TechCrunch UK reported that News Corp. may have been in talks with LinkedIn around an acquisition in that price [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] attempt to sell the company and moved to a funding round when there were no takers. Late last year TechCrunch UK reported that News Corp. may have been in talks with LinkedIn around an acquisition in that price [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Press Gazette Blogs - Media Money &#187; Noted + quoted: Thursday 29 November 2007</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/more-linkedinnews-corp-reports-coming-in/comment-page-1/#comment-96248</link>
		<dc:creator>Press Gazette Blogs - Media Money &#187; Noted + quoted: Thursday 29 November 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 13:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/more-linkedinnews-corp-reports-coming-in/#comment-96248</guid>
		<description>[...] News Corp-LinkedIn deal rumours intensify No smoke without fire: Bankers like it, but founder wants a &#8220;heckuva lot&#8221; http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/more-linkedinnews-corp-reports-coming-in/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] News Corp-LinkedIn deal rumours intensify No smoke without fire: Bankers like it, but founder wants a &#8220;heckuva lot&#8221; <a href="http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/more-linkedinnews-corp-reports-coming-in/" rel="nofollow">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/more-linkedinnews-corp-reports-coming-in/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch UK &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Murdoch linked to LinkedIn, yet again</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/more-linkedinnews-corp-reports-coming-in/comment-page-1/#comment-75525</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch UK &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Murdoch linked to LinkedIn, yet again</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 00:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/more-linkedinnews-corp-reports-coming-in/#comment-75525</guid>
		<description>[...] they were in excess of $1 billion, which happens to be $486 million. This is just the latest in a long line of stories on this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] they were in excess of $1 billion, which happens to be $486 million. This is just the latest in a long line of stories on this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Random Vandal</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/more-linkedinnews-corp-reports-coming-in/comment-page-1/#comment-73218</link>
		<dc:creator>Random Vandal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 21:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/more-linkedinnews-corp-reports-coming-in/#comment-73218</guid>
		<description>I think it is more of a question of are you happy handing all of your information over to Murdoch. It&#039;s a treasure trove of talent. Or it will be one in future if people do not leave as a result of the *possible* news corp acquisition.  This is more a question of control.

Murdoch is establishment &#039;old&#039; media and they&#039;re using ther economic clout to stifle and control the growth of the &#039;new&#039;. Controlling the flow of information is essential to the political ties held by the &#039;old&#039; media establishment so its not surprising they&#039;re finally pushing their weight about.

Empowered individuals through their own connections is productive for firms in terms of creativity but it also creates instability. 

Why?

This new web savvy generation is decidedly more critical of globalized corporate structure due to the disparity it causes as a result. With ethics becoming more and more important to consumers business&#039; will be forced to comply, but this will cost them money.

Corporations sole aim is to maximize profit and they have no/few obligations to act morally and ethically. 

I think it is more about controlling of ideas. Its a hard one to try to explain. Sorry if i&#039;m not making any sense.

Random Vandal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is more of a question of are you happy handing all of your information over to Murdoch. It&#8217;s a treasure trove of talent. Or it will be one in future if people do not leave as a result of the *possible* news corp acquisition.  This is more a question of control.</p>
<p>Murdoch is establishment &#8216;old&#8217; media and they&#8217;re using ther economic clout to stifle and control the growth of the &#8216;new&#8217;. Controlling the flow of information is essential to the political ties held by the &#8216;old&#8217; media establishment so its not surprising they&#8217;re finally pushing their weight about.</p>
<p>Empowered individuals through their own connections is productive for firms in terms of creativity but it also creates instability. </p>
<p>Why?</p>
<p>This new web savvy generation is decidedly more critical of globalized corporate structure due to the disparity it causes as a result. With ethics becoming more and more important to consumers business&#8217; will be forced to comply, but this will cost them money.</p>
<p>Corporations sole aim is to maximize profit and they have no/few obligations to act morally and ethically. </p>
<p>I think it is more about controlling of ideas. Its a hard one to try to explain. Sorry if i&#8217;m not making any sense.</p>
<p>Random Vandal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manoj Ranaweera</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/more-linkedinnews-corp-reports-coming-in/comment-page-1/#comment-73111</link>
		<dc:creator>Manoj Ranaweera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/more-linkedinnews-corp-reports-coming-in/#comment-73111</guid>
		<description>Nice story Mike. Does it really matter who owns LinkedIN, as long as they provide a niche service. What I do not get is why they bother with functionality such as Groups? I guess, that there will be further functionality rolled out, which will then make sense of why groups were introduced without sufficient functionality. I think LinkedIN has a place in the future if they do not try to become another facebook, another plaxo, etc. Just continue to do what you are good at. 

Mike, you should have been at Simon and Tony&#039;s Mashup on last Monday!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice story Mike. Does it really matter who owns LinkedIN, as long as they provide a niche service. What I do not get is why they bother with functionality such as Groups? I guess, that there will be further functionality rolled out, which will then make sense of why groups were introduced without sufficient functionality. I think LinkedIN has a place in the future if they do not try to become another facebook, another plaxo, etc. Just continue to do what you are good at. </p>
<p>Mike, you should have been at Simon and Tony&#8217;s Mashup on last Monday!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I Am Not Posting To Spam My Blog</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/more-linkedinnews-corp-reports-coming-in/comment-page-1/#comment-73098</link>
		<dc:creator>I Am Not Posting To Spam My Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/more-linkedinnews-corp-reports-coming-in/#comment-73098</guid>
		<description>@George: I would have thought that the teenagers at MySpace, who tend to be more politically sensitive to &#039;teh korporapetions&#039;, would be more likely to leave a social networking site because they didn&#039;t like the new owner than business professionals. The kids haven&#039;t left MySpace (quite the opposite) so I&#039;m not sure why the suits would leave LinkedIn.

Mind you, I&#039;m not a member of LinkedIn so I&#039;m making total guesses as to the psychology of its users. For all I know it consists entirely of twenty-two-year-old graduate analysts trying to impress each other by pretending to be directors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@George: I would have thought that the teenagers at MySpace, who tend to be more politically sensitive to &#8216;teh korporapetions&#8217;, would be more likely to leave a social networking site because they didn&#8217;t like the new owner than business professionals. The kids haven&#8217;t left MySpace (quite the opposite) so I&#8217;m not sure why the suits would leave LinkedIn.</p>
<p>Mind you, I&#8217;m not a member of LinkedIn so I&#8217;m making total guesses as to the psychology of its users. For all I know it consists entirely of twenty-two-year-old graduate analysts trying to impress each other by pretending to be directors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Black</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/more-linkedinnews-corp-reports-coming-in/comment-page-1/#comment-73082</link>
		<dc:creator>George Black</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 15:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/more-linkedinnews-corp-reports-coming-in/#comment-73082</guid>
		<description>So who likes the idea of still being a member of LinkedIn when it is owned by News Corp?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So who likes the idea of still being a member of LinkedIn when it is owned by News Corp?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
