<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google adding blogs to Universal Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eu.techcrunch.com/2007/12/14/google-adding-blogs-to-universal-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2007/12/14/google-adding-blogs-to-universal-search/</link>
	<description>Tracking European web and mobile start-ups</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 08:05:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2007/12/14/google-adding-blogs-to-universal-search/comment-page-1/#comment-83112</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 18:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/12/14/google-adding-blogs-to-universal-search/#comment-83112</guid>
		<description>Sorry. Blogs have been there for a while. I&#039;ve got several Google alerts that include blog results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry. Blogs have been there for a while. I&#8217;ve got several Google alerts that include blog results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shakir Razak</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2007/12/14/google-adding-blogs-to-universal-search/comment-page-1/#comment-83080</link>
		<dc:creator>Shakir Razak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 17:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/12/14/google-adding-blogs-to-universal-search/#comment-83080</guid>
		<description>Mike,

Could you squash the spam comments please.

More relevantly, david is right, it was at the bottom;

Also,  Don&#039;t you like Google&#039;s self-absorbtion, what we&#039;d call preferred results or self-serving -how long&#039;s yahoo been linking back to it&#039;s own sub-sites, Google has to call &quot;universal&quot;.....


Yours kindly,


Shakir Razak</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p>
<p>Could you squash the spam comments please.</p>
<p>More relevantly, david is right, it was at the bottom;</p>
<p>Also,  Don&#8217;t you like Google&#8217;s self-absorbtion, what we&#8217;d call preferred results or self-serving -how long&#8217;s yahoo been linking back to it&#8217;s own sub-sites, Google has to call &#8220;universal&#8221;&#8230;..</p>
<p>Yours kindly,</p>
<p>Shakir Razak</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#160; Paid vs Organic Search&#160;by&#160;Kitchen 2.0</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2007/12/14/google-adding-blogs-to-universal-search/comment-page-1/#comment-82759</link>
		<dc:creator>&#160; Paid vs Organic Search&#160;by&#160;Kitchen 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 15:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/12/14/google-adding-blogs-to-universal-search/#comment-82759</guid>
		<description>[...] to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!Mike Butcher, Techcrunch UK wrote this week about the mighty Google adding blogs to universal search. And writes  But it’s bad news for a SEOs and already hard-presed brand marketers. I feel so sad [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!Mike Butcher, Techcrunch UK wrote this week about the mighty Google adding blogs to universal search. And writes  But it’s bad news for a SEOs and already hard-presed brand marketers. I feel so sad [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rc</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2007/12/14/google-adding-blogs-to-universal-search/comment-page-1/#comment-82299</link>
		<dc:creator>rc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 22:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/12/14/google-adding-blogs-to-universal-search/#comment-82299</guid>
		<description>interesting artice 


rc
trading tennis blog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting artice </p>
<p>rc<br />
trading tennis blog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Eaves</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2007/12/14/google-adding-blogs-to-universal-search/comment-page-1/#comment-82142</link>
		<dc:creator>David Eaves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/12/14/google-adding-blogs-to-universal-search/#comment-82142</guid>
		<description>I have definitely seen them testing it before Don, I think I searched for search engine optimisation on google UK and a blog called PhoenixRealm.com showed up at the bottom of the page, I think it said blog results or something next to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have definitely seen them testing it before Don, I think I searched for search engine optimisation on google UK and a blog called PhoenixRealm.com showed up at the bottom of the page, I think it said blog results or something next to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dc crowley</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2007/12/14/google-adding-blogs-to-universal-search/comment-page-1/#comment-82063</link>
		<dc:creator>dc crowley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/12/14/google-adding-blogs-to-universal-search/#comment-82063</guid>
		<description>funny, thought they had already done this. BUT it&#039;s not what I want. I want continuous search! Search with rss. Yahoo has it. Ask me who is better in rss, Yahoo or Google. I&#039;ll answer Google... so what is the problem!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>funny, thought they had already done this. BUT it&#8217;s not what I want. I want continuous search! Search with rss. Yahoo has it. Ask me who is better in rss, Yahoo or Google. I&#8217;ll answer Google&#8230; so what is the problem!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

