<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BBC man checks out Seesmic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eu.techcrunch.com/2008/01/18/bbc-man-checks-out-seesmic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2008/01/18/bbc-man-checks-out-seesmic/</link>
	<description>Tracking European web and mobile start-ups</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:07:15 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Butcher</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2008/01/18/bbc-man-checks-out-seesmic/comment-page-1/#comment-98221</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Butcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 00:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2008/01/18/bbc-man-checks-out-seesmic/#comment-98221</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ll note that I balance the reference to other&#039;s criticism&#039;s with &quot;then again it is still in an invite-only Alpha release.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ll note that I balance the reference to other&#8217;s criticism&#8217;s with &#8220;then again it is still in an invite-only Alpha release.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan Pope</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2008/01/18/bbc-man-checks-out-seesmic/comment-page-1/#comment-98205</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan Pope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2008/01/18/bbc-man-checks-out-seesmic/#comment-98205</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll second Lloyd. Mike, you&#039;ve got a down on Seesmic, fair enough. We&#039;ve all ranted about it, it really bugs us. But at the same time it is highly addictive and just lovely. Facebook? What?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll second Lloyd. Mike, you&#8217;ve got a down on Seesmic, fair enough. We&#8217;ve all ranted about it, it really bugs us. But at the same time it is highly addictive and just lovely. Facebook? What?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Davis</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2008/01/18/bbc-man-checks-out-seesmic/comment-page-1/#comment-98144</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2008/01/18/bbc-man-checks-out-seesmic/#comment-98144</guid>
		<description>heh! Friday afternoon mischief Mike?  I&#039;ll save your readers from the pain of clicking through to the post you link to (though thanks for the flow) and point out that the very next word after &quot;crappy, buggy, bloated&quot; was &quot;adorable&quot;.

I do love seesmic and I love the seesmic community.  It is alpha software (still described as pre-alpha but let&#039;s not get too involved in that distinction) and we are both the testers and the test scripts.  As long as no-one has any greater expectations then I don&#039;t think there&#039;s a problem.  The seesmic guys know that they have to keep developing the product and the exciting thing is that they are including the community in that development to a huge degree.

For those who think I just love everything that&#039;s new and shiny, I did love twitter - I don&#039;t LOVE facebook, we had some hot times together, but now it&#039;s the morning after the night before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heh! Friday afternoon mischief Mike?  I&#8217;ll save your readers from the pain of clicking through to the post you link to (though thanks for the flow) and point out that the very next word after &#8220;crappy, buggy, bloated&#8221; was &#8220;adorable&#8221;.</p>
<p>I do love seesmic and I love the seesmic community.  It is alpha software (still described as pre-alpha but let&#8217;s not get too involved in that distinction) and we are both the testers and the test scripts.  As long as no-one has any greater expectations then I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s a problem.  The seesmic guys know that they have to keep developing the product and the exciting thing is that they are including the community in that development to a huge degree.</p>
<p>For those who think I just love everything that&#8217;s new and shiny, I did love twitter &#8211; I don&#8217;t LOVE facebook, we had some hot times together, but now it&#8217;s the morning after the night before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seesmic: the new Joost? &#171; I&#8217;m Simon Dickson.</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2008/01/18/bbc-man-checks-out-seesmic/comment-page-1/#comment-98114</link>
		<dc:creator>Seesmic: the new Joost? &#171; I&#8217;m Simon Dickson.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2008/01/18/bbc-man-checks-out-seesmic/#comment-98114</guid>
		<description>[...] I got an invite to the &#8216;alpha&#8217; version, and I&#8217;m afraid Techcrunch&#8217;s Mike Butcher hits the nail on the head. &#8216;Seesmic already has a number of UK advocates and users, but some have been less [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I got an invite to the &#8216;alpha&#8217; version, and I&#8217;m afraid Techcrunch&#8217;s Mike Butcher hits the nail on the head. &#8216;Seesmic already has a number of UK advocates and users, but some have been less [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
