<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPhone Nano by Christmas? Or should the Daily Mail just be banned from Techmeme?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eu.techcrunch.com/2008/08/04/iphone-nano-by-christmas-or-should-the-daily-mail-just-be-banned-from-techmeme/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2008/08/04/iphone-nano-by-christmas-or-should-the-daily-mail-just-be-banned-from-techmeme/</link>
	<description>Tracking European web and mobile start-ups</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:55:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Naady.com</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2008/08/04/iphone-nano-by-christmas-or-should-the-daily-mail-just-be-banned-from-techmeme/comment-page-1/#comment-194098</link>
		<dc:creator>Naady.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 10:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=1461#comment-194098</guid>
		<description>i don&#039;t think removing features from a gadget actually makes it better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;t think removing features from a gadget actually makes it better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2008/08/04/iphone-nano-by-christmas-or-should-the-daily-mail-just-be-banned-from-techmeme/comment-page-1/#comment-149978</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 18:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=1461#comment-149978</guid>
		<description>yea..not news..these pics were made b4 the 1st iphone even came out...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yea..not news..these pics were made b4 the 1st iphone even came out&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MobileMe&#8217;s Harshest Critic: Steve Jobs?&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2008/08/04/iphone-nano-by-christmas-or-should-the-daily-mail-just-be-banned-from-techmeme/comment-page-1/#comment-149951</link>
		<dc:creator>MobileMe&#8217;s Harshest Critic: Steve Jobs?&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 15:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=1461#comment-149951</guid>
		<description>[...] MobileMea Culpa Ars Technica&#8217;s Infinite Loop is quoting from what it says is an Apple internal e-mail in which Steve Jobs says that the buggy MobileMe synching service is &#8220;not up to Apple&#8217;s usual standards&#8221; and that it was launched too early: &#8220;The vision of MobileMe is both exciting and ambitious, and we will press on to make it a service we are all proud of by the end of this year.&#8221; That&#8217;s encouraging, I guess, although anyone who&#8217;s paying $99 a year for MobileMe may not want to wait another few months until it works like it&#8217;s supposed to. (The Apple site touts its wonders and mentions no problems.) Suggestion: Why not put MobileMe into a retroactive beta and suspend user charges until Apple&#8211;and, more important, Apple customers&#8211;are happy with it? Read more at: Infinite Loop  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MobileMea Culpa Ars Technica&#8217;s Infinite Loop is quoting from what it says is an Apple internal e-mail in which Steve Jobs says that the buggy MobileMe synching service is &#8220;not up to Apple&#8217;s usual standards&#8221; and that it was launched too early: &#8220;The vision of MobileMe is both exciting and ambitious, and we will press on to make it a service we are all proud of by the end of this year.&#8221; That&#8217;s encouraging, I guess, although anyone who&#8217;s paying $99 a year for MobileMe may not want to wait another few months until it works like it&#8217;s supposed to. (The Apple site touts its wonders and mentions no problems.) Suggestion: Why not put MobileMe into a retroactive beta and suspend user charges until Apple&#8211;and, more important, Apple customers&#8211;are happy with it? Read more at: Infinite Loop  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WebbAlert - August 5, 2008 &#124; TechTV Update</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2008/08/04/iphone-nano-by-christmas-or-should-the-daily-mail-just-be-banned-from-techmeme/comment-page-1/#comment-149942</link>
		<dc:creator>WebbAlert - August 5, 2008 &#124; TechTV Update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 14:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=1461#comment-149942</guid>
		<description>[...] The Daily Mail has a tiny story that says the UK is getting a Nano Phone for Christmas. Tech bloggers say that it&#8217;s a PR stunt, and some are even saying the Mail should be banned from Techmeme.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Daily Mail has a tiny story that says the UK is getting a Nano Phone for Christmas. Tech bloggers say that it&#8217;s a PR stunt, and some are even saying the Mail should be banned from Techmeme.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple iPhone SDK - Daily Mail claims iPhone nano ready for Christmas, the rest of us laugh &#124; iFones.com Apple iPhone 3G iPhone News</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2008/08/04/iphone-nano-by-christmas-or-should-the-daily-mail-just-be-banned-from-techmeme/comment-page-1/#comment-149886</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple iPhone SDK - Daily Mail claims iPhone nano ready for Christmas, the rest of us laugh &#124; iFones.com Apple iPhone 3G iPhone News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 03:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=1461#comment-149886</guid>
		<description>[...] not linking directly to it. The newspaper, from what I understand, is something of a rag in the UK. TechCrunch UK noted that the Mail is going after pageviews, and the crowd that follows Apple rumors would be good [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not linking directly to it. The newspaper, from what I understand, is something of a rag in the UK. TechCrunch UK noted that the Mail is going after pageviews, and the crowd that follows Apple rumors would be good [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iPhone Nano in time for Christmas? According to the Daily Mail, it is&#8230; &#124; Completely Random Tidbits</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2008/08/04/iphone-nano-by-christmas-or-should-the-daily-mail-just-be-banned-from-techmeme/comment-page-1/#comment-149876</link>
		<dc:creator>iPhone Nano in time for Christmas? According to the Daily Mail, it is&#8230; &#124; Completely Random Tidbits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 02:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=1461#comment-149876</guid>
		<description>[...] (via The Daily Mail and TechCrunch) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (via The Daily Mail and TechCrunch) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: appleforapple.com &#187; Daily Mail claims iPhone nano ready for Christmas, the rest of us laugh</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2008/08/04/iphone-nano-by-christmas-or-should-the-daily-mail-just-be-banned-from-techmeme/comment-page-1/#comment-149870</link>
		<dc:creator>appleforapple.com &#187; Daily Mail claims iPhone nano ready for Christmas, the rest of us laugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 00:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=1461#comment-149870</guid>
		<description>[...] not linking directly to it. The newspaper, from what I understand, is something of a rag in the UK. TechCrunch UK noted that the Mail is going after pageviews, and the crowd that follows Apple rumors would be good [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not linking directly to it. The newspaper, from what I understand, is something of a rag in the UK. TechCrunch UK noted that the Mail is going after pageviews, and the crowd that follows Apple rumors would be good [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daily Mail claims iPhone nano ready for Christmas, the rest of us laugh &#124; Apple,iPhone,Mac,iPod</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2008/08/04/iphone-nano-by-christmas-or-should-the-daily-mail-just-be-banned-from-techmeme/comment-page-1/#comment-149864</link>
		<dc:creator>Daily Mail claims iPhone nano ready for Christmas, the rest of us laugh &#124; Apple,iPhone,Mac,iPod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 00:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=1461#comment-149864</guid>
		<description>[...] not linking directly to it. The newspaper, from what I understand, is something of a rag in the UK. TechCrunch UK noted that the Mail is going after pageviews, and the crowd that pursues Apple rumors would be good [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not linking directly to it. The newspaper, from what I understand, is something of a rag in the UK. TechCrunch UK noted that the Mail is going after pageviews, and the crowd that pursues Apple rumors would be good [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple Rumors: Fun, Pointless, Evil&#8230;or All of the Above?&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2008/08/04/iphone-nano-by-christmas-or-should-the-daily-mail-just-be-banned-from-techmeme/comment-page-1/#comment-149832</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple Rumors: Fun, Pointless, Evil&#8230;or All of the Above?&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 18:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=1461#comment-149832</guid>
		<description>[...] The iPhone Rumor Mill The UK&#8217;s Daily Mail ignited a minor firestorm when it reported that Apple will release a cheaper, more basic &#8220;iPhone Nano&#8221; in time for Christmas. Most bloggers who know what the heck they&#8217;re talking about say that the story sounds improbable; some bash the Mail and contend that it&#8217;s manufacturing rumors to generate traffic at its Website. I still think that if Apple history holds true to form, Apple will release such a phone at some point&#8211;but it will do so in a way that has little or nothing to do with the scenario outlined in the Mail&#8217;s story. Read more at: Apple 2.0, ZDNet, Guardian.co.uk, TechCrunch UK  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The iPhone Rumor Mill The UK&#8217;s Daily Mail ignited a minor firestorm when it reported that Apple will release a cheaper, more basic &#8220;iPhone Nano&#8221; in time for Christmas. Most bloggers who know what the heck they&#8217;re talking about say that the story sounds improbable; some bash the Mail and contend that it&#8217;s manufacturing rumors to generate traffic at its Website. I still think that if Apple history holds true to form, Apple will release such a phone at some point&#8211;but it will do so in a way that has little or nothing to do with the scenario outlined in the Mail&#8217;s story. Read more at: Apple 2.0, ZDNet, Guardian.co.uk, TechCrunch UK  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danvers Baillieu</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2008/08/04/iphone-nano-by-christmas-or-should-the-daily-mail-just-be-banned-from-techmeme/comment-page-1/#comment-149806</link>
		<dc:creator>Danvers Baillieu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=1461#comment-149806</guid>
		<description>Mike - the iPhone Shuffle is already a reality - there is a demo here: 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QwnsQpcNvpE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike &#8211; the iPhone Shuffle is already a reality &#8211; there is a demo here: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QwnsQpcNvpE" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QwnsQpcNvpE</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: N</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2008/08/04/iphone-nano-by-christmas-or-should-the-daily-mail-just-be-banned-from-techmeme/comment-page-1/#comment-149798</link>
		<dc:creator>N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 13:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=1461#comment-149798</guid>
		<description>Speculation and rumour can be fun, but its definately not NEWS.

When will newspapers remember a responsibility to reporting FACT and not RUMOUR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speculation and rumour can be fun, but its definately not NEWS.</p>
<p>When will newspapers remember a responsibility to reporting FACT and not RUMOUR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miles</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2008/08/04/iphone-nano-by-christmas-or-should-the-daily-mail-just-be-banned-from-techmeme/comment-page-1/#comment-149795</link>
		<dc:creator>miles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 13:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=1461#comment-149795</guid>
		<description>Techmeme ? who cares ? 20K readers a day, mostly US 

http://trends.google.com/websites?q=techmeme.com&amp;geo=all&amp;date=mtd&amp;sort=0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Techmeme ? who cares ? 20K readers a day, mostly US </p>
<p><a href="http://trends.google.com/websites?q=techmeme.com&amp;geo=all&amp;date=mtd&amp;sort=0" rel="nofollow">http://trends.google.com/websites?q=techmeme.com&amp;geo=all&amp;date=mtd&amp;sort=0</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jez</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2008/08/04/iphone-nano-by-christmas-or-should-the-daily-mail-just-be-banned-from-techmeme/comment-page-1/#comment-149794</link>
		<dc:creator>Jez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=1461#comment-149794</guid>
		<description>Come on Mike.. never trust the Daily Hate!! 

Did you know it was the only newspaper to support the Nazi Party right until the Great Britain declared war in 1939? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daily_Mail 

Agree with you though. Putting a story like this, will probably put the readers through the roof! What next ?? a story on twitter being offline  :)

VOTE: Ban Daily Mail...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on Mike.. never trust the Daily Hate!! </p>
<p>Did you know it was the only newspaper to support the Nazi Party right until the Great Britain declared war in 1939? <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daily_Mail" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daily_Mail</a> </p>
<p>Agree with you though. Putting a story like this, will probably put the readers through the roof! What next ?? a story on twitter being offline  <img src='http://eu.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>VOTE: Ban Daily Mail&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2008/08/04/iphone-nano-by-christmas-or-should-the-daily-mail-just-be-banned-from-techmeme/comment-page-1/#comment-149790</link>
		<dc:creator>L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=1461#comment-149790</guid>
		<description>You never know! 

Those mockups aren&#039;t so crazy. Apple could theoretically reduce the iPhone&#039;s functionality to a minimum, which might work for some, as the iPhone is heavy and media intensive right now.

In any case it&#039;s unlikely that the Daily Mail would pick up this story first. Why ban them, though? Speculation and rumor is fun... 

This is loony: 

http://www.minorissues.be/wp-content/uploads/miv1/20070116-iPhoneshuffle_small.jpg

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You never know! </p>
<p>Those mockups aren&#8217;t so crazy. Apple could theoretically reduce the iPhone&#8217;s functionality to a minimum, which might work for some, as the iPhone is heavy and media intensive right now.</p>
<p>In any case it&#8217;s unlikely that the Daily Mail would pick up this story first. Why ban them, though? Speculation and rumor is fun&#8230; </p>
<p>This is loony: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.minorissues.be/wp-content/uploads/miv1/20070116-iPhoneshuffle_small.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.minorissues.be/wp-content/uploads/miv1/20070116-iPhoneshuffle_small.jpg</a></p>
<p> <img src='http://eu.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
