<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kennet puts €6.5 million into GoViral&#8217;s branded video network</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/03/24/kennet-puts-e65-million-into-govirals-branded-video-network/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/03/24/kennet-puts-e65-million-into-govirals-branded-video-network/</link>
	<description>Tracking European web and mobile start-ups</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Plataforma de vídeos virales recibe inversión de 6.5 millones de Euros &#124; NewAlter</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/03/24/kennet-puts-e65-million-into-govirals-branded-video-network/comment-page-1/#comment-208291</link>
		<dc:creator>Plataforma de vídeos virales recibe inversión de 6.5 millones de Euros &#124; NewAlter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=3956#comment-208291</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch y NewTeeVee  Publicado Jueves, Marzo 26th, 2009 (6 seconds ago) en Inversiones, Negocios en [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch y NewTeeVee  Publicado Jueves, Marzo 26th, 2009 (6 seconds ago) en Inversiones, Negocios en [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kennet Partners invierte 6,5M en GoViral</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/03/24/kennet-puts-e65-million-into-govirals-branded-video-network/comment-page-1/#comment-207978</link>
		<dc:creator>Kennet Partners invierte 6,5M en GoViral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=3956#comment-207978</guid>
		<description>[...] firma de capital de riesgo Kennet Partners ha invertido 6,5 millones de euros en GoViral, una compañía de distribución de contenido de vídeo online para [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] firma de capital de riesgo Kennet Partners ha invertido 6,5 millones de euros en GoViral, una compañía de distribución de contenido de vídeo online para [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/03/24/kennet-puts-e65-million-into-govirals-branded-video-network/comment-page-1/#comment-207678</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=3956#comment-207678</guid>
		<description>hi Jimmy
Nothing wrong with ripping off clients when you can get away with it? - not so good when they think they&#039;re buying premium (and paying high cpv for it) but getting junk?! 
Not sure there is any value in that - no matter how long the tail. (MPU slots don&#039;t have longtails...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi Jimmy<br />
Nothing wrong with ripping off clients when you can get away with it? &#8211; not so good when they think they&#8217;re buying premium (and paying high cpv for it) but getting junk?!<br />
Not sure there is any value in that &#8211; no matter how long the tail. (MPU slots don&#8217;t have longtails&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Lovell</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/03/24/kennet-puts-e65-million-into-govirals-branded-video-network/comment-page-1/#comment-207674</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Lovell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=3956#comment-207674</guid>
		<description>@ Paul

What&#039;s wrong with that model? Isn&#039;t it just monetising the long tail?

GoViral spends time and effort aggregating blog and other premium sites, sorting them into categories that media buyers want to buy and then charges for that service.

Media buyers don&#039;t have to use GoViral&#039;s service: if what you say is true, they could just do it themselves. Instead, they use GoViral.

So could it not be that GoVIral is adding value somewhere along the way?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Paul</p>
<p>What&#8217;s wrong with that model? Isn&#8217;t it just monetising the long tail?</p>
<p>GoViral spends time and effort aggregating blog and other premium sites, sorting them into categories that media buyers want to buy and then charges for that service.</p>
<p>Media buyers don&#8217;t have to use GoViral&#8217;s service: if what you say is true, they could just do it themselves. Instead, they use GoViral.</p>
<p>So could it not be that GoVIral is adding value somewhere along the way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/03/24/kennet-puts-e65-million-into-govirals-branded-video-network/comment-page-1/#comment-207671</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=3956#comment-207671</guid>
		<description>OMG! - Did Kennet not do the DD? Go &quot;Spam&quot; viral use ad networks to buy their traffic at .01c and sell it to clients at 11c! Great profit for them, not so good for clients! Its Heavy.com 2.0!
Go Go viral!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG! &#8211; Did Kennet not do the DD? Go &#8220;Spam&#8221; viral use ad networks to buy their traffic at .01c and sell it to clients at 11c! Great profit for them, not so good for clients! Its Heavy.com 2.0!<br />
Go Go viral!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/03/24/kennet-puts-e65-million-into-govirals-branded-video-network/comment-page-1/#comment-207646</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=3956#comment-207646</guid>
		<description>They may have first mover advantage, but from what I&#039;ve heard they&#039;ve got shonky technology and a not so startling value proposition.  Well, maybe that&#039;s why they&#039;ve sold out to Kennet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They may have first mover advantage, but from what I&#8217;ve heard they&#8217;ve got shonky technology and a not so startling value proposition.  Well, maybe that&#8217;s why they&#8217;ve sold out to Kennet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

