<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gone in 140 characters &#8211; Privacy issues raised as Twitter employee hands over personal details of @Skype registrant to Skype</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/04/07/gone-in-140-characters-privacy-issues-raised-as-twitter-employee-hands-over-personal-details-of-skype-registrant-to-skype/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/04/07/gone-in-140-characters-privacy-issues-raised-as-twitter-employee-hands-over-personal-details-of-skype-registrant-to-skype/</link>
	<description>Tracking European web and mobile start-ups</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:52:27 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: De naam van je organisatie op internet, deel 2 &#124; Ambtenaar 2.0</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/04/07/gone-in-140-characters-privacy-issues-raised-as-twitter-employee-hands-over-personal-details-of-skype-registrant-to-skype/comment-page-1/#comment-237697</link>
		<dc:creator>De naam van je organisatie op internet, deel 2 &#124; Ambtenaar 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 06:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=4172#comment-237697</guid>
		<description>[...] van Skype, maar zij bleef eigenaar van de naam toen ze het bedrijf verliet, totdat Twitter tussenbeide kwam. Andersom kan ook. Aangezien het verboden is om twitternamen te verkopen, is James Cox, oprichter [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] van Skype, maar zij bleef eigenaar van de naam toen ze het bedrijf verliet, totdat Twitter tussenbeide kwam. Andersom kan ook. Aangezien het verboden is om twitternamen te verkopen, is James Cox, oprichter [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brergibra</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/04/07/gone-in-140-characters-privacy-issues-raised-as-twitter-employee-hands-over-personal-details-of-skype-registrant-to-skype/comment-page-1/#comment-228274</link>
		<dc:creator>Brergibra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=4172#comment-228274</guid>
		<description>Где скачать Диму Билана?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Где скачать Диму Билана?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: riffic</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/04/07/gone-in-140-characters-privacy-issues-raised-as-twitter-employee-hands-over-personal-details-of-skype-registrant-to-skype/comment-page-1/#comment-212555</link>
		<dc:creator>riffic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 11:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=4172#comment-212555</guid>
		<description>Your problem is not Twitter&#039;s problem. Set up an OpenMicroBlogging compliant server such as laconica and host your own namespace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your problem is not Twitter&#8217;s problem. Set up an OpenMicroBlogging compliant server such as laconica and host your own namespace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: riffic</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/04/07/gone-in-140-characters-privacy-issues-raised-as-twitter-employee-hands-over-personal-details-of-skype-registrant-to-skype/comment-page-1/#comment-212554</link>
		<dc:creator>riffic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 11:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=4172#comment-212554</guid>
		<description>twitter might have a critical mass of users, but they have a namespace problem. This is why a decentralized system such as laconica/open micro blogging is a better solution for the long term. why trust anyone else to control usernames?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>twitter might have a critical mass of users, but they have a namespace problem. This is why a decentralized system such as laconica/open micro blogging is a better solution for the long term. why trust anyone else to control usernames?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Things I learned today &#124; lozfisher.com</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/04/07/gone-in-140-characters-privacy-issues-raised-as-twitter-employee-hands-over-personal-details-of-skype-registrant-to-skype/comment-page-1/#comment-212401</link>
		<dc:creator>Things I learned today &#124; lozfisher.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 16:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=4172#comment-212401</guid>
		<description>[...] Twitter fail [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Twitter fail [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter geeft persoonlijke gegevens door aan bedrijven &#124; Carriere</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/04/07/gone-in-140-characters-privacy-issues-raised-as-twitter-employee-hands-over-personal-details-of-skype-registrant-to-skype/comment-page-1/#comment-212335</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter geeft persoonlijke gegevens door aan bedrijven &#124; Carriere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=4172#comment-212335</guid>
		<description>[...] uk.techcrunch.com Lees ook:Hoe Twitter kan leiden tot &#8216;ontslag&#8217; Lees ook:Monsterboard gehackt, gegevens [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] uk.techcrunch.com Lees ook:Hoe Twitter kan leiden tot &#8216;ontslag&#8217; Lees ook:Monsterboard gehackt, gegevens [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcela Saiffe</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/04/07/gone-in-140-characters-privacy-issues-raised-as-twitter-employee-hands-over-personal-details-of-skype-registrant-to-skype/comment-page-1/#comment-212330</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcela Saiffe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=4172#comment-212330</guid>
		<description>Yes, make a lot of fuzz on this one, but keep dropping the hundeds of Skype Users that had their accounts hijacked and set an unconfirmed authorization to autorecharge, and billed several times in matter of minutes.
Skype delays 4 days in respond, and instead of suspending accounts while investigating, allow hijackers to use the Skype Credit at large.
Shame on Skype!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, make a lot of fuzz on this one, but keep dropping the hundeds of Skype Users that had their accounts hijacked and set an unconfirmed authorization to autorecharge, and billed several times in matter of minutes.<br />
Skype delays 4 days in respond, and instead of suspending accounts while investigating, allow hijackers to use the Skype Credit at large.<br />
Shame on Skype!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liens rapides du 7 avril 2009 au 10 avril 2009</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/04/07/gone-in-140-characters-privacy-issues-raised-as-twitter-employee-hands-over-personal-details-of-skype-registrant-to-skype/comment-page-1/#comment-212325</link>
		<dc:creator>Liens rapides du 7 avril 2009 au 10 avril 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=4172#comment-212325</guid>
		<description>[...] Gone in 140 characters - Privacy issues raised as Twitter employee hands over personal details of @S... - ‘Twitter name resolution’ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gone in 140 characters &#8211; Privacy issues raised as Twitter employee hands over personal details of @S&#8230; &#8211; ‘Twitter name resolution’ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter закладывает своих пользователей &#171; Все обо всем</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/04/07/gone-in-140-characters-privacy-issues-raised-as-twitter-employee-hands-over-personal-details-of-skype-registrant-to-skype/comment-page-1/#comment-212303</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter закладывает своих пользователей &#171; Все обо всем</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 07:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=4172#comment-212303</guid>
		<description>[...] своём блоге, а также в электронной переписке с журналистом TechCrunch Робески поясняет, что несколько [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] своём блоге, а также в электронной переписке с журналистом TechCrunch Робески поясняет, что несколько [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spanky</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/04/07/gone-in-140-characters-privacy-issues-raised-as-twitter-employee-hands-over-personal-details-of-skype-registrant-to-skype/comment-page-1/#comment-212206</link>
		<dc:creator>spanky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 20:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=4172#comment-212206</guid>
		<description>Yes. Give up now. You are done for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. Give up now. You are done for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter заложил пользователя Skype &#171; Daily Prophet</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/04/07/gone-in-140-characters-privacy-issues-raised-as-twitter-employee-hands-over-personal-details-of-skype-registrant-to-skype/comment-page-1/#comment-212137</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter заложил пользователя Skype &#171; Daily Prophet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 16:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=4172#comment-212137</guid>
		<description>[...] пояснила в своем блоге,а также в электронной переписке с журналистом TechCrunch ,что создала данную учетную [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] пояснила в своем блоге,а также в электронной переписке с журналистом TechCrunch ,что создала данную учетную [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Golden</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/04/07/gone-in-140-characters-privacy-issues-raised-as-twitter-employee-hands-over-personal-details-of-skype-registrant-to-skype/comment-page-1/#comment-212045</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Golden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 12:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=4172#comment-212045</guid>
		<description>Antje, I have that problem, too. Squatter with four tweets in over two years using my brand name. Problem tickets to Twitter, research to find an email to ask the person nicely to release the account since she&#039;s not using...
No reply.
A simple google before picking a name would save everyone a lot of problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Antje, I have that problem, too. Squatter with four tweets in over two years using my brand name. Problem tickets to Twitter, research to find an email to ask the person nicely to release the account since she&#8217;s not using&#8230;<br />
No reply.<br />
A simple google before picking a name would save everyone a lot of problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StevieB&#8217;s Shared Items - April 9, 2009 at Lost in Cyberspace</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/04/07/gone-in-140-characters-privacy-issues-raised-as-twitter-employee-hands-over-personal-details-of-skype-registrant-to-skype/comment-page-1/#comment-212018</link>
		<dc:creator>StevieB&#8217;s Shared Items - April 9, 2009 at Lost in Cyberspace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 10:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=4172#comment-212018</guid>
		<description>[...] Gone in 140 characters - Privacy issues raised as Twitter employee hands over personal details of @S...April 7, 2009 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gone in 140 characters &#8211; Privacy issues raised as Twitter employee hands over personal details of @S&#8230;April 7, 2009 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chaitanyak</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/04/07/gone-in-140-characters-privacy-issues-raised-as-twitter-employee-hands-over-personal-details-of-skype-registrant-to-skype/comment-page-1/#comment-211973</link>
		<dc:creator>chaitanyak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 06:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=4172#comment-211973</guid>
		<description>of course in the event that i leave the company and they go and delete my company mail account...which has all these details(reg confirmations etc..) in it... well sux to be them :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>of course in the event that i leave the company and they go and delete my company mail account&#8230;which has all these details(reg confirmations etc..) in it&#8230; well sux to be them <img src='http://eu.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chaitanyak</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/04/07/gone-in-140-characters-privacy-issues-raised-as-twitter-employee-hands-over-personal-details-of-skype-registrant-to-skype/comment-page-1/#comment-211972</link>
		<dc:creator>chaitanyak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 06:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=4172#comment-211972</guid>
		<description>meh, big hoopla over a molehill.
I registered @flipdesign for the place i work at (flipdesign.in) and i just forwarded the username and password to all the &quot;heads&quot; of the company.. i did the same with our youtube and flickr accounts as well. 

The key thing is that  i register these &quot;company&quot; accounts, using my COMPANY EMAIL ID only.. so even if i leave the company and none of them remember that the details to these accounts are in their mailboxes... if they contact twitter, they arn&#039;t going to get any of my personal details.

problem solved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>meh, big hoopla over a molehill.<br />
I registered @flipdesign for the place i work at (flipdesign.in) and i just forwarded the username and password to all the &#8220;heads&#8221; of the company.. i did the same with our youtube and flickr accounts as well. </p>
<p>The key thing is that  i register these &#8220;company&#8221; accounts, using my COMPANY EMAIL ID only.. so even if i leave the company and none of them remember that the details to these accounts are in their mailboxes&#8230; if they contact twitter, they arn&#8217;t going to get any of my personal details.</p>
<p>problem solved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Privacy Lost: Twitter Surrenders @Skype Registrant Info to Skype &#124; Blippitt</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/04/07/gone-in-140-characters-privacy-issues-raised-as-twitter-employee-hands-over-personal-details-of-skype-registrant-to-skype/comment-page-1/#comment-211926</link>
		<dc:creator>Privacy Lost: Twitter Surrenders @Skype Registrant Info to Skype &#124; Blippitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 02:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=4172#comment-211926</guid>
		<description>[...] it&#8217;s a non-issue because Twitter will just hand over your information to that company at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it&#8217;s a non-issue because Twitter will just hand over your information to that company at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris - VC</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/04/07/gone-in-140-characters-privacy-issues-raised-as-twitter-employee-hands-over-personal-details-of-skype-registrant-to-skype/comment-page-1/#comment-211909</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris - VC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 00:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=4172#comment-211909</guid>
		<description>No offense dude, but you&#039;re an idiot.  She was one of the first founding employees, really nice and super smart, and made a pretty penny when Skype was sold.  So... bitter? umm.. no.  But I suppose you&#039;re not the type of person who has a corporate IM account through Yahoo/Google/whathaveyou and didn&#039;t &quot;turn it over&quot; to your former employer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No offense dude, but you&#8217;re an idiot.  She was one of the first founding employees, really nice and super smart, and made a pretty penny when Skype was sold.  So&#8230; bitter? umm.. no.  But I suppose you&#8217;re not the type of person who has a corporate IM account through Yahoo/Google/whathaveyou and didn&#8217;t &#8220;turn it over&#8221; to your former employer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RIck Webb</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/04/07/gone-in-140-characters-privacy-issues-raised-as-twitter-employee-hands-over-personal-details-of-skype-registrant-to-skype/comment-page-1/#comment-211902</link>
		<dc:creator>RIck Webb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 23:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=4172#comment-211902</guid>
		<description>The story seems to say not that Skype said &quot;we can&#039;t get in touch with stephanie&quot; but that Skype said &quot;hey we want that account name&quot; and twitter said &quot;oh it belongs to the email address stephanie.lastname@somedomain.com&quot;

Skype clearly didn&#039;t know Stephanie owned it - like she said, they&#039;re on friendly terms - and Twitter told them who owned it. 

I think the interesting key point not here yet is whether or not the domain name on the email address was skype.com or not.  If Skype called, and Twitter&#039;s looking at the registered email address, and it&#039;s a skype email address, well, then, did they really do anything wrong? But if she registered at, say, her gmail address, it definitely should have been protected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The story seems to say not that Skype said &#8220;we can&#8217;t get in touch with stephanie&#8221; but that Skype said &#8220;hey we want that account name&#8221; and twitter said &#8220;oh it belongs to the email address <a href="mailto:stephanie.lastname@somedomain.com">stephanie.lastname@somedomain.com</a>&#8221;</p>
<p>Skype clearly didn&#8217;t know Stephanie owned it &#8211; like she said, they&#8217;re on friendly terms &#8211; and Twitter told them who owned it. </p>
<p>I think the interesting key point not here yet is whether or not the domain name on the email address was skype.com or not.  If Skype called, and Twitter&#8217;s looking at the registered email address, and it&#8217;s a skype email address, well, then, did they really do anything wrong? But if she registered at, say, her gmail address, it definitely should have been protected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Privacy issues raised as Twitter employee hands over personal details of @Skype registrant to Skype &#124; dralnuX.com</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/04/07/gone-in-140-characters-privacy-issues-raised-as-twitter-employee-hands-over-personal-details-of-skype-registrant-to-skype/comment-page-1/#comment-211860</link>
		<dc:creator>Privacy issues raised as Twitter employee hands over personal details of @Skype registrant to Skype &#124; dralnuX.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 20:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=4172#comment-211860</guid>
		<description>[...] Not long after Twitter launched, Stephanie Robesky of Atomico, the venture fund established by the former founders of Skype, registered @Skype while still at the company. But, she says in a blog post yesterday, she forgot about the move, only to be reminded of it after she realised a Twitter employee had handed out her name, email address and contact details to someone at Skype who then contacted her.  Full Story@ Tech Crunch (UK) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Not long after Twitter launched, Stephanie Robesky of Atomico, the venture fund established by the former founders of Skype, registered @Skype while still at the company. But, she says in a blog post yesterday, she forgot about the move, only to be reminded of it after she realised a Twitter employee had handed out her name, email address and contact details to someone at Skype who then contacted her.  Full Story@ Tech Crunch (UK) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prob</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/04/07/gone-in-140-characters-privacy-issues-raised-as-twitter-employee-hands-over-personal-details-of-skype-registrant-to-skype/comment-page-1/#comment-211859</link>
		<dc:creator>Prob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 20:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=4172#comment-211859</guid>
		<description>they should just sell the damn usernames and create a marketplace - would solve *everything* without stupid TOS rules etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they should just sell the damn usernames and create a marketplace &#8211; would solve *everything* without stupid TOS rules etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey Duncan</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/04/07/gone-in-140-characters-privacy-issues-raised-as-twitter-employee-hands-over-personal-details-of-skype-registrant-to-skype/comment-page-1/#comment-211837</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 19:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=4172#comment-211837</guid>
		<description>No.  Using it without permission is not in itself &quot;a violation of federal law&quot;.   In fact, I can call myself &quot;Skype&quot; without violating any trademark.  I can open a business with the name Skype without violating federal law.   What I can&#039;t do without consequences, is start a Voip business using the name Skype, and not because &quot;its a violation of federal law&quot; (which sounds like a crime) its because it infringes upon someone elses intellectual property which may lead to a civil lawsuit by the owner.  

They had to pass a law to prevent cybersquatting of trademarks, but that law only applies to domain names, not Twitter IDs.

Now, if that violates some part of twitter&#039;s TOS, that&#039;s different, but it does not make it a crime.   Plus, I would like to know if the user in question was actually tweeting under the name or whether it was just out there not being used.   If it was just out there, then Twitter really looks the jackass with that email they sent.

Regardless, Twitter handled this situation badly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No.  Using it without permission is not in itself &#8220;a violation of federal law&#8221;.   In fact, I can call myself &#8220;Skype&#8221; without violating any trademark.  I can open a business with the name Skype without violating federal law.   What I can&#8217;t do without consequences, is start a Voip business using the name Skype, and not because &#8220;its a violation of federal law&#8221; (which sounds like a crime) its because it infringes upon someone elses intellectual property which may lead to a civil lawsuit by the owner.  </p>
<p>They had to pass a law to prevent cybersquatting of trademarks, but that law only applies to domain names, not Twitter IDs.</p>
<p>Now, if that violates some part of twitter&#8217;s TOS, that&#8217;s different, but it does not make it a crime.   Plus, I would like to know if the user in question was actually tweeting under the name or whether it was just out there not being used.   If it was just out there, then Twitter really looks the jackass with that email they sent.</p>
<p>Regardless, Twitter handled this situation badly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey Duncan</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/04/07/gone-in-140-characters-privacy-issues-raised-as-twitter-employee-hands-over-personal-details-of-skype-registrant-to-skype/comment-page-1/#comment-211818</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 18:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=4172#comment-211818</guid>
		<description>Actually, Alex, 

a)  the presumption of innocence can be found in the Constitution, although not those precise words.  Look to the provisions which talk about due process and the cases interpreting same.  Think about it in the negative. Would removing the presumption of innocence violate the constitution?  If the answer is yes (and it is), that means the right is in the Constitution.

b)  As far as individuals, it&#039;s true I don&#039;t have to give anyone the presumption of innocence, but I would argue that it is a part of our culture, at least among mature adults, that we do offer the presumption of innocence to each other.   This is both from American ideals of liberty and biblical principles as well.

c)  I really don&#039;t think a rebuttal to this is required.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Alex, </p>
<p>a)  the presumption of innocence can be found in the Constitution, although not those precise words.  Look to the provisions which talk about due process and the cases interpreting same.  Think about it in the negative. Would removing the presumption of innocence violate the constitution?  If the answer is yes (and it is), that means the right is in the Constitution.</p>
<p>b)  As far as individuals, it&#8217;s true I don&#8217;t have to give anyone the presumption of innocence, but I would argue that it is a part of our culture, at least among mature adults, that we do offer the presumption of innocence to each other.   This is both from American ideals of liberty and biblical principles as well.</p>
<p>c)  I really don&#8217;t think a rebuttal to this is required.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Fisher</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/04/07/gone-in-140-characters-privacy-issues-raised-as-twitter-employee-hands-over-personal-details-of-skype-registrant-to-skype/comment-page-1/#comment-211817</link>
		<dc:creator>David Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 18:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=4172#comment-211817</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s be clear about what &quot;Personal information&quot; was handed over (and available to Twitter). 

In filling out your Twitter profile you put in your Name (can be anything you want, but shows up in your profile) and Email address. The only other &quot;contact information&quot; is your website link and timezone (both are which also shown by default. 

The ONLY thing that&#039;s not shown publicly are your DMs (which everyone knows to not tell too much private info over to begin with), and your email address. 

So basically Skype got in touch with Twitter and said, &quot;Hey we can&#039;t get in touch with Stephanie, she used to work with us, but we don&#039;t have a current valid email address. She has our Skype account. We&#039;d prefer that you not just nuke the account, but that you help us get in touch with her.&quot; and then the guy told them her email address. I&#039;m sure it seemed innocent enough at the time. 

Twitter does NOT have: 
-phone
-Credit card info
-SSN/EIN
-DoB
-birthplace
-mailing/billing address
-etc

Kinda overblown. I get the *privacy* issue, but it was a major company asking for a former employee&#039;s email address. Yes, I realize how this could be abused, but seriously...? Is email address PII to most people? 

She was in violation of Trademark by keeping that name/asset after leaving the company AND against Twitter&#039;s TOS for squatting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s be clear about what &#8220;Personal information&#8221; was handed over (and available to Twitter). </p>
<p>In filling out your Twitter profile you put in your Name (can be anything you want, but shows up in your profile) and Email address. The only other &#8220;contact information&#8221; is your website link and timezone (both are which also shown by default. </p>
<p>The ONLY thing that&#8217;s not shown publicly are your DMs (which everyone knows to not tell too much private info over to begin with), and your email address. </p>
<p>So basically Skype got in touch with Twitter and said, &#8220;Hey we can&#8217;t get in touch with Stephanie, she used to work with us, but we don&#8217;t have a current valid email address. She has our Skype account. We&#8217;d prefer that you not just nuke the account, but that you help us get in touch with her.&#8221; and then the guy told them her email address. I&#8217;m sure it seemed innocent enough at the time. </p>
<p>Twitter does NOT have:<br />
-phone<br />
-Credit card info<br />
-SSN/EIN<br />
-DoB<br />
-birthplace<br />
-mailing/billing address<br />
-etc</p>
<p>Kinda overblown. I get the *privacy* issue, but it was a major company asking for a former employee&#8217;s email address. Yes, I realize how this could be abused, but seriously&#8230;? Is email address PII to most people? </p>
<p>She was in violation of Trademark by keeping that name/asset after leaving the company AND against Twitter&#8217;s TOS for squatting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitterers: Don&#8217;t Expect Privacy When You Squat a Brand Name.&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/04/07/gone-in-140-characters-privacy-issues-raised-as-twitter-employee-hands-over-personal-details-of-skype-registrant-to-skype/comment-page-1/#comment-211805</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitterers: Don&#8217;t Expect Privacy When You Squat a Brand Name.&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 16:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=4172#comment-211805</guid>
		<description>[...] The user id @skype was registered to Stephanie Robesky, a former employee of the company who is now with venture capital firm Atomico, started by the former Skype founders. According to her own account, while at the company she registered the name and told someone in marketing &#8220;who ignored her,&#8221; according to TechCrunch Europe. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The user id @skype was registered to Stephanie Robesky, a former employee of the company who is now with venture capital firm Atomico, started by the former Skype founders. According to her own account, while at the company she registered the name and told someone in marketing &#8220;who ignored her,&#8221; according to TechCrunch Europe. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter gibt Benutzerdaten weiter &#124; easytopia</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/04/07/gone-in-140-characters-privacy-issues-raised-as-twitter-employee-hands-over-personal-details-of-skype-registrant-to-skype/comment-page-1/#comment-211794</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter gibt Benutzerdaten weiter &#124; easytopia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 16:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=4172#comment-211794</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch zitierte die Antwort von Twitter [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch zitierte die Antwort von Twitter [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
