<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Updated: Tweetmeme accuses Retweet.com of stealing its code</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/07/27/tweetmeme-accuses-retweetcom-of-stealing-its-code/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/07/27/tweetmeme-accuses-retweetcom-of-stealing-its-code/</link>
	<description>Tracking European web and mobile start-ups</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:17:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: caps</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/07/27/tweetmeme-accuses-retweetcom-of-stealing-its-code/comment-page-1/#comment-534989</link>
		<dc:creator>caps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 08:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=7405#comment-534989</guid>
		<description>Look at this link it! You must be a windfall

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edhatstore.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;top quality MLB caps&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look at this link it! You must be a windfall</p>
<p><a href="http://www.edhatstore.com" rel="nofollow">top quality MLB caps</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandie</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/07/27/tweetmeme-accuses-retweetcom-of-stealing-its-code/comment-page-1/#comment-501613</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 04:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=7405#comment-501613</guid>
		<description>I need to hear exactly what  will change with that =D

 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iconiccigars.com/Davidoff-Series-Classic/Davidoff-Classic-No-3-Bx-25.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Davidoff Classic No 3&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I need to hear exactly what  will change with that =D</p>
<p><a href="http://www.iconiccigars.com/Davidoff-Series-Classic/Davidoff-Classic-No-3-Bx-25.html" rel="nofollow">Davidoff Classic No 3</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TwittLink: Share Fast And Tweet From Your Site With Others &#124; BrainPair - the Techno Blog</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/07/27/tweetmeme-accuses-retweetcom-of-stealing-its-code/comment-page-1/#comment-268661</link>
		<dc:creator>TwittLink: Share Fast And Tweet From Your Site With Others &#124; BrainPair - the Techno Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 06:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=7405#comment-268661</guid>
		<description>[...] were to take off it could face questions from both Tweetmeme over the button (this happened previously with Retweet.com), and Leo Laporte&#8217;s TWiT Network over the name (this happens quite a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] were to take off it could face questions from both Tweetmeme over the button (this happened previously with Retweet.com), and Leo Laporte&#8217;s TWiT Network over the name (this happens quite a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TwittLink: Share Fast And Tweet From Your Site With Others - Programming Blog</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/07/27/tweetmeme-accuses-retweetcom-of-stealing-its-code/comment-page-1/#comment-268604</link>
		<dc:creator>TwittLink: Share Fast And Tweet From Your Site With Others - Programming Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 22:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=7405#comment-268604</guid>
		<description>[...] were to take off it could face questions from both Tweetmeme over the button (this happened previously with Retweet.com), and Leo Laporte&#8217;s TWiT Network over the name (this happens quite a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] were to take off it could face questions from both Tweetmeme over the button (this happened previously with Retweet.com), and Leo Laporte&#8217;s TWiT Network over the name (this happens quite a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TwittLink: Share Fast And Tweet From Your Site With Others</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/07/27/tweetmeme-accuses-retweetcom-of-stealing-its-code/comment-page-1/#comment-268600</link>
		<dc:creator>TwittLink: Share Fast And Tweet From Your Site With Others</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 22:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=7405#comment-268600</guid>
		<description>[...] were to take off it could face questions from both Tweetmeme over the button (this happened previously with Retweet.com), and Leo Laporte&#8217;s TWiT Network over the name (this happens quite a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] were to take off it could face questions from both Tweetmeme over the button (this happened previously with Retweet.com), and Leo Laporte&#8217;s TWiT Network over the name (this happens quite a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Things Aren&#8217;t Looking Good For Retweet.com&#160;&#124;&#160;Black Web 2.0</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/07/27/tweetmeme-accuses-retweetcom-of-stealing-its-code/comment-page-1/#comment-254433</link>
		<dc:creator>Things Aren&#8217;t Looking Good For Retweet.com&#160;&#124;&#160;Black Web 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 13:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=7405#comment-254433</guid>
		<description>[...] seems that Retweet.com blatantly ripped off Tweetmeme&#8217;s code. Not only did they steal some of the JavaScript that makes the retweet button work, but they [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] seems that Retweet.com blatantly ripped off Tweetmeme&#8217;s code. Not only did they steal some of the JavaScript that makes the retweet button work, but they [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Retweet.com launches… and they’re *still* using Tweetmeme’s code &#124; My Blog</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/07/27/tweetmeme-accuses-retweetcom-of-stealing-its-code/comment-page-1/#comment-253878</link>
		<dc:creator>Retweet.com launches… and they’re *still* using Tweetmeme’s code &#124; My Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 22:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=7405#comment-253878</guid>
		<description>[...] service that wants to steal Tweetmeme&#8217;s crown. We covered them before when it appeared that wasn&#8217;t all they were borrowing from Tweetmeme. But it seems Retweet.com are ploughing on, undaunted by the consequences (moral or otherwise) of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] service that wants to steal Tweetmeme&#8217;s crown. We covered them before when it appeared that wasn&#8217;t all they were borrowing from Tweetmeme. But it seems Retweet.com are ploughing on, undaunted by the consequences (moral or otherwise) of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Retweet.com Is No Competition for Tweetmeme - Programming Blog</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/07/27/tweetmeme-accuses-retweetcom-of-stealing-its-code/comment-page-1/#comment-253465</link>
		<dc:creator>Retweet.com Is No Competition for Tweetmeme - Programming Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 23:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=7405#comment-253465</guid>
		<description>[...] a service makes its debut by getting accused of stealing code from one of its competitors, you know that it&#8217;s going to be a tough road ahead. That was the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a service makes its debut by getting accused of stealing code from one of its competitors, you know that it&#8217;s going to be a tough road ahead. That was the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Retweet.com is No Competition for Tweetmeme &#124; Family Learning Center</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/07/27/tweetmeme-accuses-retweetcom-of-stealing-its-code/comment-page-1/#comment-253289</link>
		<dc:creator>Retweet.com is No Competition for Tweetmeme &#124; Family Learning Center</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=7405#comment-253289</guid>
		<description>[...] a service makes its debut by getting accused for stealing code from one of its competitors, you know that it&#8217;s going to be a tough road ahead. That was the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a service makes its debut by getting accused for stealing code from one of its competitors, you know that it&#8217;s going to be a tough road ahead. That was the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: web: Retweet.com is No Competition for Tweetmeme &#124; Alseek:The Academic Search Engine</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/07/27/tweetmeme-accuses-retweetcom-of-stealing-its-code/comment-page-1/#comment-253278</link>
		<dc:creator>web: Retweet.com is No Competition for Tweetmeme &#124; Alseek:The Academic Search Engine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=7405#comment-253278</guid>
		<description>[...] a service makes its debut by getting accused for stealing code from one of its competitors, you know that it&#039;s going to be a tough road ahead. That was the case [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a service makes its debut by getting accused for stealing code from one of its competitors, you know that it&#8217;s going to be a tough road ahead. That was the case [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Retweet.com launches… and they’re *still* using Tweetmeme’s code&#160;</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/07/27/tweetmeme-accuses-retweetcom-of-stealing-its-code/comment-page-1/#comment-252456</link>
		<dc:creator>Retweet.com launches… and they’re *still* using Tweetmeme’s code&#160;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 22:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=7405#comment-252456</guid>
		<description>[...] service that wants to steal Tweetmeme&#8217;s crown. We covered them before when it appeared that wasn&#8217;t all they were borrowing from Tweetmeme. But it seems Retweet.com are ploughing on, undaunted by the consequences (moral or otherwise) of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] service that wants to steal Tweetmeme&#8217;s crown. We covered them before when it appeared that wasn&#8217;t all they were borrowing from Tweetmeme. But it seems Retweet.com are ploughing on, undaunted by the consequences (moral or otherwise) of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Retweet.com launches&#8230; and they&#8217;re *still* using Tweetmeme&#8217;s code</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/07/27/tweetmeme-accuses-retweetcom-of-stealing-its-code/comment-page-1/#comment-252335</link>
		<dc:creator>Retweet.com launches&#8230; and they&#8217;re *still* using Tweetmeme&#8217;s code</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=7405#comment-252335</guid>
		<description>[...] service that wants to steal Tweetmeme&#8217;s crown. We covered them before when it appeared that wasn&#8217;t all they were borrowing from Tweetmeme. But it seems Retweet.com are ploughing on, undaunted by the consequences (moral or otherwise) of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] service that wants to steal Tweetmeme&#8217;s crown. We covered them before when it appeared that wasn&#8217;t all they were borrowing from Tweetmeme. But it seems Retweet.com are ploughing on, undaunted by the consequences (moral or otherwise) of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen Hunt</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/07/27/tweetmeme-accuses-retweetcom-of-stealing-its-code/comment-page-1/#comment-249426</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen Hunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 22:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=7405#comment-249426</guid>
		<description>How did I miss this news and not hear about it?
This is a hilarious story - some company copying another&#039;s code and passing it off as theirs. 

Thanks guys for this post, I have added retweet.com to my black list. I won&#039;t be using their service as it turns out that they are stealing code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did I miss this news and not hear about it?<br />
This is a hilarious story &#8211; some company copying another&#8217;s code and passing it off as theirs. </p>
<p>Thanks guys for this post, I have added retweet.com to my black list. I won&#8217;t be using their service as it turns out that they are stealing code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweetmeme’s traffic surge could make it a Twitter buy target&#160;</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/07/27/tweetmeme-accuses-retweetcom-of-stealing-its-code/comment-page-1/#comment-249305</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweetmeme’s traffic surge could make it a Twitter buy target&#160;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=7405#comment-249305</guid>
		<description>[...] No wonder Mesiab Labs wanted in on the action. And no wonder Nick Halstead recently wound down fav.or.it to concentrate on his new product. The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] No wonder Mesiab Labs wanted in on the action. And no wonder Nick Halstead recently wound down fav.or.it to concentrate on his new product. The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweetmeme&#8217;s traffic surge could make it a Twitter buy target</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/07/27/tweetmeme-accuses-retweetcom-of-stealing-its-code/comment-page-1/#comment-249144</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweetmeme&#8217;s traffic surge could make it a Twitter buy target</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=7405#comment-249144</guid>
		<description>[...] No wonder Mesiab Labs wanted in on the action. And no wonder Nick Halstead recently wound down fav.or.it to concentrate on his new product. The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] No wonder Mesiab Labs wanted in on the action. And no wonder Nick Halstead recently wound down fav.or.it to concentrate on his new product. The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 布里斯班</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/07/27/tweetmeme-accuses-retweetcom-of-stealing-its-code/comment-page-1/#comment-245057</link>
		<dc:creator>布里斯班</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=7405#comment-245057</guid>
		<description>Users would not care who is the original...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Users would not care who is the original&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Andrew</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/07/27/tweetmeme-accuses-retweetcom-of-stealing-its-code/comment-page-1/#comment-245041</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=7405#comment-245041</guid>
		<description>Is this so different from stealing photos? Like you did last week Milo?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this so different from stealing photos? Like you did last week Milo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Livingstone-Perez</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/07/27/tweetmeme-accuses-retweetcom-of-stealing-its-code/comment-page-1/#comment-245022</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Livingstone-Perez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=7405#comment-245022</guid>
		<description>I think when it comes to the social world you need to be a lot more careful than perhaps others have been in the last 15 years of copying and pasting web code. 

This new visibility will sure bring some questions about openness... imagine what will happen in the coming years when it is not &quot;open&quot; code that is copied but open data.


Decided to write a blog post about it.

&quot;the confusion of copying code on the web&quot;
http://bit.ly/12O3LG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think when it comes to the social world you need to be a lot more careful than perhaps others have been in the last 15 years of copying and pasting web code. </p>
<p>This new visibility will sure bring some questions about openness&#8230; imagine what will happen in the coming years when it is not &#8220;open&#8221; code that is copied but open data.</p>
<p>Decided to write a blog post about it.</p>
<p>&#8220;the confusion of copying code on the web&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://bit.ly/12O3LG" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/12O3LG</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StevieB&#8217;s Shared Items &#8211; July 28, 2009 at Lost in Cyberspace</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/07/27/tweetmeme-accuses-retweetcom-of-stealing-its-code/comment-page-1/#comment-245012</link>
		<dc:creator>StevieB&#8217;s Shared Items &#8211; July 28, 2009 at Lost in Cyberspace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 09:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=7405#comment-245012</guid>
		<description>[...] Tweetmeme accuses Retweet.com of stealing its codeJuly 27, 2009 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tweetmeme accuses Retweet.com of stealing its codeJuly 27, 2009 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allison</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/07/27/tweetmeme-accuses-retweetcom-of-stealing-its-code/comment-page-1/#comment-244951</link>
		<dc:creator>Allison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=7405#comment-244951</guid>
		<description>Good luck trademarking retweet (per your blog post). You may own the domain, but never the word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good luck trademarking retweet (per your blog post). You may own the domain, but never the word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alan p</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/07/27/tweetmeme-accuses-retweetcom-of-stealing-its-code/comment-page-1/#comment-244944</link>
		<dc:creator>alan p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 23:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=7405#comment-244944</guid>
		<description>This is quite an interesting case - in essence its no different in law to copying and minor alteration of someone&#039;s else&#039;s music, video or other prior art to create a new piece.

Also, arguably it is just taking a small sample of someone else&#039;s total code base to reproduce, much like taking bits from reports etc to make one&#039;s own, with minor alterations.

And besides, as we all apparently support piracy in music and video, why not for code?

(Not supporting Retweet here, just pointing out the plusses and minusses of the impact of perfect digital reproduction)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is quite an interesting case &#8211; in essence its no different in law to copying and minor alteration of someone&#8217;s else&#8217;s music, video or other prior art to create a new piece.</p>
<p>Also, arguably it is just taking a small sample of someone else&#8217;s total code base to reproduce, much like taking bits from reports etc to make one&#8217;s own, with minor alterations.</p>
<p>And besides, as we all apparently support piracy in music and video, why not for code?</p>
<p>(Not supporting Retweet here, just pointing out the plusses and minusses of the impact of perfect digital reproduction)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessi</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/07/27/tweetmeme-accuses-retweetcom-of-stealing-its-code/comment-page-1/#comment-244923</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=7405#comment-244923</guid>
		<description>Um, Im pretty sure that is exaclty what Kevin&#039;s post was above ^ http://rt.nu/-m95</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, Im pretty sure that is exaclty what Kevin&#8217;s post was above ^ <a href="http://rt.nu/-m95" rel="nofollow">http://rt.nu/-m95</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Name*</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/07/27/tweetmeme-accuses-retweetcom-of-stealing-its-code/comment-page-1/#comment-244921</link>
		<dc:creator>Name*</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=7405#comment-244921</guid>
		<description>And TechCrunch steals Tweetmeme or Retweet.com&#039;s code by posting it here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And TechCrunch steals Tweetmeme or Retweet.com&#8217;s code by posting it here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter C</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/07/27/tweetmeme-accuses-retweetcom-of-stealing-its-code/comment-page-1/#comment-244920</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=7405#comment-244920</guid>
		<description>I have no idea why I wrote essentially the same thing twice in two seperate paragraphs.

really wish techcrunch would overhaul their comment system (hint: disqus)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea why I wrote essentially the same thing twice in two seperate paragraphs.</p>
<p>really wish techcrunch would overhaul their comment system (hint: disqus)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter C</title>
		<link>http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/07/27/tweetmeme-accuses-retweetcom-of-stealing-its-code/comment-page-1/#comment-244919</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/?p=7405#comment-244919</guid>
		<description>the best retweet.com can do now is just own up, apologize for being daft and try to release a great product. 

this is rapidly becoming a trainwreck, everyone knows they fucked up, they&#039;ve been caught out - just fess up, offer a public apology to tweetmeme and get on with the product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the best retweet.com can do now is just own up, apologize for being daft and try to release a great product. </p>
<p>this is rapidly becoming a trainwreck, everyone knows they fucked up, they&#8217;ve been caught out &#8211; just fess up, offer a public apology to tweetmeme and get on with the product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

