Is anybody out there? Tech companies #fail at social media, says study
by Steve O'Hear
on August 5, 2010

Nearly every company has a social media presence these days, right? And, naturally, tech companies execute best. Although perhaps not.

A slightly self-serving study by PR and marketing agency Wildfire, which analysed the social media activity of the 2009 Deloitte Fast Tech 50, found that 90% of the UK tech companies featured had a presence on two or more social networks but the majority fail to actually use social media in a social way. Instead, far too many brands are treating the likes of Twitter and Facebook as a traditional marketing channel.

Staggeringly (or maybe not), while 74% of companies operated an official Twitter account, 43% of brands had never replied to a single tweet. Overall, the study found that 57% used Twitter solely for one-way marketing activity.

The use of Facebook didn’t fair any better either. Wildfire found that 20% of those on the Deloitte Fast Tech 50 list had a presence on the social networking site, a paltry 25% of brands reply to followers’ comments on their Facebook accounts, while 60% of companies with a Facebook page used it purely as a distribution channel.

Oh dear.

I could go on but the bottom line is that for all of the social media marketing hype, the reality is a little out of kilter. Music no doubt to the ears of opportunistic social media marketeers everywhere who I’m sure are keen to help.

For what it’s worth, my experience of poor social media execution by companies on Twitter goes something like this: I tweet a customer complaint. A few hours later I get an @ reply from the brand’s official account offering to help or to put me in touch with somebody who can. I reply, giving more details of the problem, and thank them for offering to intervene. And then silence.

Companies, tech or otherwise, would do well to remember that in the age of social media, customer service is PR.

Or something like that.

(On a serious note, Wildfire do dish out some good, if not rather obvious, advice in the full report, which, yes, I did actually read.)

Advertisement
  • Jenni

    It’s an interesting study, but some of the screenshots suggest it was conducted back in May – a lifetime in social media. I imagine things have changed a lot since then.

  • Chris Z

    That’s a great report there. Comprehensive and indepth. Good one.

    It’s also true that many companies don’t see the value in interaction and conversation with their audience. It’s takes alot of ‘micro-effort’, but the in the long-run it’s ultimately worthwhile.

    And talking about #fails, there’s been one serious Social Media blunder just recently…check out the article at The Next Web: http://thenextweb.com/socialmedia/2010/07/21/facebooks-newest-partner-is-an-internet-troll/

  • Rob

    I know that my very large tech company spam the hell out of me on twitter with #tagged-beyond-readability gibberish that they think is how people on twitter want to consume information. I don’t think they get it yet as an interactive channel (although fortunately many of the employees do) and I don’t think that’s changed since May and I don’t think we’re unique.

  • http://leestacey.com @LStacey

    How did they get 43% of 50?

  • jave

    why should a tech company be any better at social marketing than a non tech company?

  • http://www.ajgraham.com Alex Graham

    “I imagine things have changed a lot since then.”

    Have you ever worked for a big company? You’d be lucky to see ~5% changes every quarter

  • http://www.shuttercal.com/calendar/DefaultArtist/ Scott

    By business is guilty of this too, I must admit…

    I think the explaination is that Founders of budding social sites are knee deep in coding & designing the actual site. Its a full time job in itself, to businesses that are often started from scratch with little or no funding.

    Also… having a good idea for a social site + being a coder/designer does not = social media strategist by any means. It’s like asking an author to press, hype, ad campaign, and distribute their book while writing it. Authors write and publishers publish. This is why it’s so clear to me that the social web industry is still trying to define itself.

  • Jenni

    I mean in terms of what those companies are doing in terms of social media. I know at least a few of that list have created Facebook pages since this study was done, for example. There are quite a few SMEs on that list as well.

  • http://www.shuttercal.com/calendar/DefaultArtist/ Scott

    Further on this thought… maybe PR firms might consider getting into the business of VC investing in start-ups they want to promote, rather than trying to bill them for expensive campaigns many can’t afford (and therefore seek VC to obtain) ,sort of like the publishing or industry…

  • http://www.shuttercal.com/calendar/DefaultArtist/ Scott

    agreed.

  • Phil T

    That’s all well and good however it would be interesting to see just how much of their business was affected negatively by using Social Media ‘incorrectly’.

    The chances are that it wont because these channels are just not relevant to how these large, corporate entites do business.

  • http://www.gminsidenews.com/forums/f57/view-non-auto-world-5-reasons-why-ford-kicking-butt-94128/index4.html#post2121677 A view from the non-auto world: 5 Reasons why Ford is kicking butt. – Page 4 – GM Inside News Forum

    [...] before partnering with GMC. Anyway, the timing of this post here couldn't come at a better time – http://eu.techcrunch.com/2010/08/05/…ia-says-study/ You can fail at social media, it is quite easy in fact. If you fail to capiviate your audience [...]

  • Phil T

    Just checked the list of 50 companies, which I should have done before commenting, and found on one ‘large corporate entity’ on there – which makes my previous comment moot! I’ll see myself out.

  • Scott C

    “Overall, the study found that 57% used Twitter solely for one-way marketing activity.”

    And that is why Twitter is nothing more than a glorified RSS feed. Been saying that for years.

  • Peter

    “Staggeringly (or maybe not), while 74% of companies operated an official Twitter account, 43% of brands had never replied to a single tweet.”.

    74% of 50 is 37. 43% of 37 is 16.

  • http://www.palrelay.com Martyn Walker

    @LStacey Hahahah! Great comment, made me read it again :)

  • Arvind

    Steve w.r.t to this article we want to get in touch with you. Can you email to me on the id I just deposited?

    Tx,
    Arvind

  • morn

    Twitter is even more bad. Remember, those 3 newscaster that were fired because of a single tweet?

  • Don H.

    How many of you with FB accounts actually interact with commercial interests? Maybe I’m weird, but it’s a rarity for me. I think I ‘liked’ the Ford 2011 Explorer and something other product… but it was a one time visit.

  • http://www.shuttercal.com/calendar/DefaultArtist/ Scott

    We have a handful of super-members that interact with our companies facebook page… but it’s mostly because we use it to highlight members photography and praise user activities. Over all it’s a good resource for us when we find time to update it.

  • http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2010/08/pilgrims-picks-for-august-5.html Pilgrim’s Picks for August 5

    [...] Is anybody out there? Tech companies #fail at social media, says study [...]

  • http://www.socialprblog.com Marcie Bell

    360i published a report last week which delivered similar findings http://blog.360i.com/pov/360i-whitepaper-twitter-the-consumer-marketer-dynamic. Too many marketers on a steep learning curve feeling compelled to push stuff out so they are seen to be doing the ‘right thing’.

  • http://googleadsense.us/08/pilgrim%e2%80%99s-picks-for-august-5.html Pilgrim’s Picks for August 5 | Google Adsense

    [...] Is anybody out there? Tech companies #fail at social media, says study [...]

  • http://seo.dotneter.org/2010/08/05/pilgrim%e2%80%99s-picks-for-august-5/ Pilgrim’s Picks for August 5 | Google Seo Guide

    [...] Is anybody out there? Tech companies #fail at social media, says study [...]

  • http://www.eclipsemagazine.com Michelle

    The problem is everything is so splintered. I have a hard enough time keeping up with posting content to my small news site and dealing with everything related to that than wasting time trying to build an audience on Twitter, Facebook, etc. When there’s nothing in it for me (really).

    I think this push by hipster media companies like Tech Crunch to get everyone to use stuff like Twitter and Facebook is silly. No one has ever been able to explain what good having 100,000 followers on Twitter actually is. I always think it’s kind of interesting that Twitter doesn’t necessarily drive traffic, popular people drive traffic to Twitter/Facebook….

  • http://www.all-leo.com/?p=493 Tech companies have unsocial social campaigns « All-Leo

    [...] Read on over at TechCrunch. [...]

  • http://www.palrelay.com Martyn Walker

    @Michelle PalRelay wil solve the splinter effect by keeping everything with you every page you visit, and no, its not another toolbar or plugin or yet another social media site.

    Apologies for the plug but reading this and the comments has left me no choice. Shoot me down in flames.

  • http://www.tiny.cc/sj3e5 dikko

    yes perhaps they did change a lot. http://www.tiny.cc/sj3e5

  • http://www.eclipsemagazine.com Michelle

    Neat, I’ll have to give it a look.

  • Jan

    Most companies suck when it comes to customer care. Changing it to “Social Media” doesn´t make a difference.

  • http://www.invideous.com Jack Thorogood

    Uh, doesn’t this actually suggest social media is a waste of marketing time/resources?

    These are the *fastest growing tech companies* and many of them aren’t bothering with social media marketing. Shock and horror that they aren’t doing more social media marketing kind of misses the point / inconvenient truth…

  • http://constanthit.com/2010/08/pilgrim%e2%80%99s-picks-for-august-5/ Pilgrim’s Picks for August 5 | webmarketingexperts.com.au | webmarketingexperts.com.au |

    [...] Is anybody out there? Tech companies #fail at social media, says study [...]

  • http://blog.imagespacemedia.com/2010/08/05/whats-happening-around-the-web-tech-companies-and-social-media/ What’s Happening Around the Web: Tech Companies and Social Media | Image Space Media Blog

    [...] presence. But that is not always the case, according to an article from TechCrunch today called "Is Anybody Out There? Tech Companies #Fail at Social Media, Says Study." "Old Phone 2" by stock.xchng user [...]

  • Henway

    Social media = waste of time and excuse to chat with ppl

    Focus on conversion ratios, SEO, customer acquisition, and REVENUE

    And NOT fluffy fail whales.

  • http://itthing.com/itthings-pick-4 ItThing’s Pick #4 | It Thing!

    [...] Tech Companies Fail At Social Media [Technology] [...]

  • Spencer Chen

    Social media is not a sales channel, it’s marketing or customer service…and that’s why you see the appropriate-levels attention and spend on it. Believe me, if you can get more yield out of social media programs, you’d have more senior execs in charge of much better funded programs.

    Zappos was providing great customer service and world-class customer engagement way BEFORE social media initiatives were around. It’s a culture-thing, not a social media-thing.

  • http://www.gomediaonline.com Chris Tompkins

    This report is very interesting indeed. I believe Sage Software recently did a report where it said that 65% of companies are not actively using social media to the full extent (and this is something that I see everyday).

    Basically they were stating supports the article presented here. Their point was that 65% of businesses are setting up profiles, pages, groups, etc, then filling out the profile/content and then waiting for the magic to happen.

    Unfortunately that isn’t the way it works. The magic is generated through interaction and engagement. Hopefully this trend will taper off as more people harness the power of this medium.

  • http://www.hytencontent.com/2010/08/the-3-big-lessons-of-tech-blogs-that-succeed/ The 3 big lessons of tech blogs that succeed | Hyten Content

    [...] this I saw this post from Techcrunch that’s really kind of a bummer: Is anybody out there? Tech companies #fail at social media, says study by Steve O’Hear. The post mentions a “self-serving” report by a PR company that [...]

  • http://socialmediabust.com Robert Bacal

    Apart from the usual glib explanations of why many businesses are not using social media (well( there are two very compelling ones.

    1) It doesn’t work very well, and the huge majority of businesses who try it, fail at it as indicated by account abandonment figures for businesses.

    2) You can’t scale participation AND be social. It’s great to be idealistic and personally I find it sad that social media isn’t social any more but that’s the reality. You can’t scale social. More on why social media isn’t social:

    http://socialmediabust.com/social-media-topics/25-future-of-social-media/77-future-of-social-media-and-business-is-not-social.html

  • http://www.trademarkia.com/ Maria Orlova

    It is important to integrate social media into your marketing strategy. You can’t wait around for some journalist to find out about you, and its sites like twitter, facebook, linkedin, any social media/tech-y blog site, that can really put your small business or start up in the headlines. If you want to increase your quality score and page rank, you need to have big sites mention you.

    SEO is good and all, but its only one side of the coin, you need to have people talk about you, not just see your ads or relevant keywords. I would rather go with a company active in the internet community than not (i.e. replying to mentions, looking more like a human than a robot)

    My company, Trademarkia actually launched Sep. 2009 at the TechCrunch50 conference :) Now were in the process of integrating a Social Media name check because we realize how important it is to protect your brand name in social media sites.

  • http://sminorgs.net Courtney Hunt

    I think it’s way too early to draw conclusions about the “failure” of organizations to leverage social media as a marketing/sales/customer service tool, and WAY too early to ring a death knell for social media.

    More importantly, it should be noted that this study had a very narrow (and as Steve mentioned, somewhat self serving) focus. It examined the external applications of social media primarily through a few social networking platforms. I suspect that if these firms were surveyed in terms of their use of social media tools internally, the results would be quite different.

    We should all remember that social media and social networking are not synonymous, and that external applications are just the tip of the iceberg with respect to how 2.0 technologies will impact organizations.

    Courtney Hunt
    Founder, Social Media in Organizations (SMinOrgs) Community

  • todd

    If your customers don’t consume your content or your services (that you profit by selling, not giving away in hopes of some advertising deal down the road) via twitter/facebook, then why invest resources in it? Maybe they will down the road, but for now it is one more avenue that the typical smb has little motivation to explore.

  • http://share.themarketingarm.com/?p=194 ShareBlog | next week in digital

    [...] Study Finds Tech Companies Fail at Social Media In a study analyzing the social media activities of Deloitte’s Fast 50 in technology, UK PR/Marketing group Wildfire discovered some surprising finds. Of the 50 companies surveyed 43% had never responded to a single tweet, and over half of the tech companies (57%) were using Twitter as a one-way marketing channel. [...]

  • http://www.maxtb.com/2010/08/11/pr-coverage-a-new-perspective/ PR coverage- a new perspective | Max Tatton Blog

    [...] there was a real rush of excitement the next day when stories started to emerge everywhere from TechCrunch through to familiar faces like Econsultancy, Computer Weekly and PR Week. We take great joy in [...]

  • http://www.marketingteamdirect.com/blog/2010/08/commentary-on-is-anyone-out-there/ Marketing Team Direct

    [...] seems from Steve O’Hear’s  “Is Anyone Out There?” article posted on TechCrunch last week, that yes a lot of companies now know about the [...]

  • http://guywhitcroft.com/2010/12/02/who-controls-your-brand/ Who Controls Your Brand? | Whit's End

    [...] Is anybody out there? Tech companies #fail at social media, says study (eu.techcrunch.com) [...]

  • http://gawlitta.wordpress.com/2010/11/29/social-media-guidelines/ Social-Media-Guidelines « Digitale Immovationen

    [...] von größter Relevanz, dass diese nicht wie ein traditioneller Marketingkanal behandelt werden – was jedoch oftmals der Fall ist. Entweder scheinen den Unternehmen (noch) die benötigten Strukturen zur erfolgreichen Nutzung von [...]

  • http://www.hervelegerbuy.net Hervelegerbuynet

    Along that path covered with Alexander Wang shoes new york, walked slowly into my heart. However, before the arrival of each dream high end designer handbags, I still would put my thoughts into every night vintage Alexander McQueen shoes, I still feel your heart will be there look a like Jimmy Choo Slingbacks.

  • http://www.guccidiscounting.com Pao8041

    Yves Saint Laurent sandals, is you to “Let the wind blow and waves beat, is worth strolling” mentality and original Yves Saint Laurent Slingbacks the bearing life of self-confidence.Although I know that in every Yves Saint Laurent Booties brands, you will be marching from the night Manolo Blahnik shoes

  • http://www.hervelegerbuy.net herve leger

    In fitness activities should be paid attention to in the following unusually feels:In fitness activities,Christian Louboutin Wedges sale in addition to start practicing certain gyrations outside,Jimmy Choo Shoes  prom Dresses won’t appear giddy feeling. If produce lasting or short dizzy, it should not be forced activities. Especially in old people, should stop activities,Jimmy Choo Slingbacks medical diagnosis, especially to focus on the cardiovascular system and cervical aspects inspection.In all sports activity or activities should not happen after head pain. Happen,Jimmy Choo Sandals should stop activities headaches,Jimmy Choo Pumps focus on nerve and cardio-cerebral vascular system inspection.

  • http://www.hervelegerbuy.net ChristianLouboutin

    Self feel there is life the natural reaction of the body,Christian Louboutin Shoes  Sale but also people physical changes of the signal.Christian Louboutin Boots divided into normal feeling and abnormal feeling.Christian Louboutin Pumps Normal feeling very thirsty,cheap Christian Louboutin Sandals, trapped, deficient, cold, heat, bilge,Christian Louboutin Evening, hemp, these feelings may along with of the changed conditions and to eliminate.

  • http://www.meritline.com/laser-pointer---c-14339.aspx Green Laser Pointer

    something new about the laser tecnology i found hare.

  • http://www.meritline.com/laser-pointer---c-14339.aspx Green Laser Pointer

    something new about the laser tecnology i found hare.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Advertisement